Category: Immunity & Resilience

KRILL OIL

Krill Oil as an excellence source of healthy fats and a variety of healthy benefits

Krill oil is extracted from a tiny shrimp (crustacean) that belongs to the species of Euphausia Superba.

According to research findings, Krill oil is reported to ease inflammation in patients with cardiac disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis.

It is a rich source of the long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

Marine-based animals such as shrimps and Krill oil are rich in Astaxanthins, an antioxidant carotenoid, which is a potent anti-inflammatory and pain reliever. More than that, Astaxanthin reduces the inflammatory compounds that drive many chronic diseases. Astaxanthin supports the body’s natural ability to fight diabetes, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, immune disorders and heart disease.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study (Suzuki et al, 2016) investigated the effect of Krill oil on mild knee pain. The sample included 50 adults, aged 38–85 years old who were observed for a period of 7 months. The sample was split into two groups. Participants were randomized to receive 2 g per day of either the oil or an identical placebo for 30 days. There was an improvement in the participants that took the Krill oil in terms of pain while they were sleeping and standing. Therefore it seems that the use of Krill oil has an impact as a supplemental treatment for arthritis and joint pain.

Another randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study (Deutsch, L. 2007) investigated the effect of Krill oil on patients with chronic inflammation and pain in patients with osteoarthritis. The sample included 90 patients. The sample was split into two groups. Participants were randomized to receive 300 mg Krill oil daily and the other group receive a placebo.  The results of the study clearly indicate that taking Krill oil at a daily dose of 300 mg significantly inhibits inflammation and reduces arthritic symptoms within a short treatment period of 7 and 14 days.

A recent review of seven studies (Ursoniu et al, 2017) concluded that Krill oil is effective at lowering the LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, and may increase HDL cholesterol.

Another double-blind, randomized clinical study (Cicero et al, 2016) compared the effect of Krill and purified omega 3 (PUFA) in 25 mildly overweight people. Participants were randomized and half received 500 mg Krill oil twice daily, while the other half received 1,000 mg omega 3, twice daily. The results of the study showed that the intake of daily Krill oil improved inflammation more effectively, compared to the daily dosage of 2,000 mg  of purified omega-3s.

In one study out of South Korea (jung, JY, 2014), supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids was found to reduce inflammatory acne by an impressive 42 percent.

As if you needed another reason to get in your daily dose, some research shows that omega-3 fatty acids could be associated with a decreased risk of certain types of cancer.

In particular, studies have found that a higher intake of omega-3 fatty acids from supplementation or fish consumption may be associated with a reduced risk of prostate and breast cancer (Terry, PD, 2004). A study published in the European Journal of Cancer Prevention also found that higher consumption of omega-3 fatty acids was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer (Zhong, X, 2013).

Besides the symptoms reported by users that range from heating sensation and skin irritation, headaches, eye and sleep problems, to short-term memory loss, disorientation and brain tumour, there is a growing body of research that mobile phones have adverse effects on health that cannot be dismissed. The industry, however, has continued to insist that there is insufficient evidence, that the phones are ‘safe’ and that the radiation they emit falls well within the guidance laid down by the NRPB, which currently refuses to acknowledge any such need and has stuck rigidly to its position of only taking account of heating effects in its guidance (the case with all international guidance), despite growing evidence and criticism.

THERMAL VERSUS NON-THERMAL EFFECTS
The whole of the debate over mobile phones – and indeed over other sources of non-ionizing radiation such as VDUs, power lines, etc – centres on the evidence for and against thermal versus non-thermal biological effects. A thermal or heating effect on tissue is the currently accepted way that most orthodox scientists in this area consider that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can pose a significant hazard to the body and thus all guidance, both national and international, continues to be based on this assumption. Even the Stewart Report has not basically challenged this view.

However, a growing body of evidence and opinion over the last decade indicates that effects can occur at levels well below that at which tissue begins to heat up and that these non-thermal effects can pose significant risk. But to assess this research, it is important to understand basically how a mobile phone works.

HOW A MOBILE PHONE WORKS
Digital (as opposed to the older analogue) mobile phones use a frequency of approximately 900 MegaHertz (MHz) for the GSM (Global System Mobile) system used by Vodafone and Cellnet, and 1800 MHz for the PCN (Personal Communication Network) system used by Orange and One2One. Both fall in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum, but phones for one system cannot be used with the other.

Besides the general evidence for the potential hazards of microwave radiation (which is used as a weapon system by both the Russians and the West), there is a further reason for concern: the mobile phone signal is ‘pulsed’. This means that the main frequency ‘carries’ another signal – in this case at 217 Hz -which generates a regular, low-frequency pulsing effect into the brain. In fact, there are further subtle, harmonic pulses and fields to which the user is exposed. It is these, as well as other parameters of the signal, that are causing concern and which are not properly taken into account in current guidance advice.

The proposed new TETRA system (Truncated Terrestrial Radio), to be used mainly for the emergency services, some corporate networks and the London Underground, is especially alarming in this respect since it uses not only a 420 MHz signal (producing a waveform that maximizes radiation absorption for 3-6 year-olds!) but also a pulse at 17 Hz, right in the brain’s beta rhythm!! This, despite a complete lack of research on possible health effects! BT has awarded a �2.5bn contract to Motorola to roll out the system across the UK, which will require in the order of 25,000 new masts. It is also promoted by Dolphin Telecom, which is owned by the Canada-based giant TIW, one of the winners of the licenses’ auction.

RECENT RESEARCH FINDINGS
In 1998 Dr Kjell-Hansson Mild at the National Institute of Working Life in Umea, Sweden, reported a study of 11,000 users in Norway and Sweden comparing symptoms according to duration of use of both analogue and GSM phones.3 Concentrating on the latter (since they represent 95% of phones sold in the UK), he found a significant dose-response relationship between reported symptoms (fatigue, headache, warmth behind or on ear, burning skin sensation) and duration of use, covering less than 2 minutes, 2-15 minutes, 15-60 minutes and over 1 hour. For example, those Swedes using a phone for more than an hour were 22 times more likely to report an increase in warmth behind the ear than those using them for less than 2 minutes; the equivalent figure for Norwegians was 16-fold (see Table 1). These results clearly show that a heating effect does occur, although how far it penetrates into the brain and whether this effect itself is responsible for all the reported symptoms, is still unclear.

Other research, also in Sweden by Professor Leif Salford at Lund University, has shown that radiation at mobile phone frequency can change the blood-brain barrier that normally allows certain chemicals to cross and keeps others out. He observed that after only 2 minutes’ exposure to mobile phone intensities, rats displayed changes in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier.4 This is clearly a worrying finding that suggests a non-thermal effect. Work by Prof. Ross Adey in the US, a world leader in research with over 35 years’ experience, has shown that calcium efflux in brain cells can occur when exposed to low-level microwave radiation near mobile phone frequencies.

Another American researcher, Professor Henry Lai, at the University of Washington in Seattle, has reported increased strand breaks in DNA in rats’ brains, although some are claiming not to be able to replicate the effect.

Back in the UK Dr Alan Preece at Bristol University reported in April 1999 that he had observed an effect of mobile phone radiation on human cognition – specifically the speeding up of a choice reaction test.b However, given that he used 15 different tests on only two groups of 18 subjects exposed for two sessions of 30 minutes, the finding may easily have been a chance result. Also the signal used did not exactly match that produced by a GSM phone, a deficit not helped by the derisory grant from the Department of Health of a mere �3,000!

By contrast, Dr John Tattersall, based at Porten Down Chemical and Biological Defence base in Wiltshire, funded to the tune of �113,000 by the DoH, recently reported effects of RF radiation of rats’ hippocampal brain sections at non-thermal levels well below current NRPB guidelines. He observed changes in the electrically evoked potentials and in long-term potentiation that were not due to heating.

Aside from his results one has to ask why the DoH choose to give such a sum to Porton Down rather than awarding it on the open university market place where one can be reasonably assured that all results will be fully published.

Meanwhile at Nottingham University Dr David de Pomerai has exposed nematode worms to microwaves from a Nokia 2110 phone and found that their cells produce high levels of ‘heat shock proteins’ (HSPs), at levels that did not produce a measurable temperature rise. HSPs are so-named because they were first observed to be produced in response to a considerable rise in temperature (at least 2�C) but in fact are produced whenever cells start to experience any damage to the protein structure in DNA and RNA.

Table 1. Adjusted Odds Ratios (p<0.05) for calling time using GSM phone with reference to reported symptom. Reference category is calling time less than 2 minutes a day (K-H Mild et al, 1998)
—————————————————————–

NORWAY

Symptom 2-15 min/d 15-60min/d >60 min/d

Fatigue 1.10 1.55 4.14

Headache 1.94 2.69 6.31

Warmth behind ear 1.68 2.93 16.0

Warmth on ear 1.65 3.94 8.37

Burning skin 1.56 3.48 8.42

SWEDEN

Fatigue 1.25 1.80 1.40

Headache 1.49 2.50 2.83

Warmth behind ear 2.63 9.00 21.9

Warmth on ear 2.73 10.2 22.4

Burning skin 1.06 2.34 2.77

—————————————————————–

It is research such as the above that is causing a growing number of researchers and others to be concerned over non-thermal effects and to question the real safety of any guidance based solely on limiting thermal increases.

NRPB GUIDANCE BASED ON SAR
Current NRPB and international guidance is based on the SAR, which is a measure on how much radiation is absorbed per gram of tissue over a given time. The NRPB focuses purely on preventing temperature rises exceeding 1�C and bases its guidance on keeping any heating to less than 10 watts per kilogram (10 W/kg) in any 10 grams of tissue averaged over 6 minutes. By contrast, the International Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation (ICNIRP) uses 2 W/kg – five times lower (the US uses 1.6 W/kg but in I gram of tissue). The Stewart Report recommended that the UK fall in line with Europe and adopt the ICNIRP levels in place of current NRPB guidelines, which is at least a step in the right direction but an embarrassment to the NRPB -particularly as this was also recommended in September 1999 by a House of Commons Select Committee Report ,9 but rejected at the time.

However, the whole basis of using SAR as a reliable measure of exposure, given the complexities of the signal, has been questioned. At a special seminar held at the House of Commons in June 1999, with speakers from overseas (including Prof. Lai from the US) and the NRPB (including Professor Richard Doll) and attended by MPs and pressure groups, Professor Michael Kundi, of the Institute of Environmental Health at the University of Vienna, presented five basic assumptions in using an SAR for mobile phones that can be scientifically challenged.l0 As Kundi pointed out, the use of an SAR is only valid if a continuous wave applies (as in a microwave oven), but where the signal is modulated as with the pulsed mobile phone signal this measure is not appropriate because of the stronger effect such a signal has been shown to have on biological membranes.

Although SARs may enable a useful, crude comparison of phones’ emissions, many argue that their actual value as indicators of relative safety may be misleading. The Stewart report recommended that new research should aim to elucidate this issue. In the meantime one can take measures to reduce exposure from both types of radiation.

PROTECTIVE DEVICES – BEWARE THE SCARE – WHICH? PROJECT!
The Stewart Report recommended that an independent assessment be made of the efficacy of protective devices on the market. According to the DTI, they have already commissioned independent tests of hands-free kits and will publish the results shortly.

Although the NRPB tends to dismiss the need for or efficacy of protective devices, the BMA, in its evidence to the above House of Commons Committee, called for ‘prudent avoidance’ and recommended that consumers should have access to protective devices to reduce radiation. One of the possible ways of achieving the latter is to use a remote, hands-free earpiece that significantly reduces radiation into the head.

However, this year’s April issue of Which? published a report (pp. 11-17) claiming that research it had carried out showed that hands-free headsets tripled EMF exposure www.which.net. However, the claimed results have been strongly criticized and Which? has been less than forthcoming in releasing its data and methodology. The research was actually carried out by ERA Technology in Leatherhead, Surrey, which tested only two phones but refuse to discuss their findings. They did not do a full SAR test but instead took a single set of readings of the electric and magnetic fields 4 cm inside a simulated skull. This was criticized by Dr Alan Preece at Bristol University who said they should have done at least three measurements.

Having finally been pressured into releasing the full report, it transpires that what the Which? test actually found was that the electric field was three times higher if the phone was connected to the earpiece compared to when placed next to the model head – but only when the phone was vertically below the head (as when strapped to the user’s belt). When placed horizontally, the field was unchanged. In either situation the magnetic field was also unchanged.

By contrast, tests carried out for Vodafone by Dr Camelia Gabriel, of Microwave Consultants in London and a director of SARTest, which specializes in developing ‘phantom’ heads to test SARs, have found no such increased exposure. Indeed, even in a worst-case situation, SAR reductions of more than 80% were measured (for full results, see www.sartest.com). Her results strongly challenge the validity of Which?’s results and methodology, which in turn casts some doubt over other tests they have performed.

Previous tests by others, such as Alasdair Philips of the consumer information group Powerwatch, have found only a 15-30% increase into the ear in a worse case scenario. Thus, these devices are useful for keeping the phone away from the body and only emphasize advice to keep calls as short as possible.

Of other devices on the market, the two with the most research and testing are the Microshield and Tecno AO Antenna. The former is a barrier shield that tests show does reduce radiation into head significantly, depending on what level of power the phone is using. The Tecno device aims to boost the body’s ability to cope with the radiation and aims to reduce the effects of the 217Hz pulse, which tests show it does mitigate. Both provide research to back up their claims.

Given the evidence that already exists, the research yet to be done, and the considerable uncertainty over the validity of current guidance, some sort of protection, especially for young people, is wise, as well as keeping calls as short as possible. Considering the organs involved I would strongly suggest it is worth erring on the side of caution: you are talking about cumulative, pulsed RF radiation into your head, eyes and other organs possibly every day for the rest of your life! For children, especially, that will hopefully – be a very long time.

References

1. Mobile Phones and Health. IEGMP (Chair: Sir William Stewart), 2000. Full report at website: www.iegmp.org.uk. Also available from the NRPB, price f20; ring (01235) 831600.

2. R. Coghill. Mobile Phones and Health: why the missing evidence? Electromagnetic Hazard & Therapy (I ).I I. 2000.

3. Comparison o(analogue and digital mobile phone users and symptoms. A Swedish Norwegian epidemiological study. Kjell-Hansson Mild et al, National Inst. Of Working Life, Umea, Sweden, Arbetslivsrapport 23. 1998. Email:forlage@niwl.se for details and cost.

4. Salford L et al. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier by 915 MHz electromagnetic radiation, continuous wave and modulated at 8, 16, 50, 200 Hz. Microsc. Res Tech. 27:535-42. 1994.

5. Lai H & Singh N. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Intern J Radiat Biol. 69:513-21. 1996.

6. Preece A et al. Effect of a 915MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive functioning man. Intern] Radiat Biol. 75(4):447-56. 1999.

7. Tattersall J et al. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic felds in the electrophysiology of rat brain slices in vitro. EE Science meeting, 28 June 1999, London, ref: 99043. CBD Porton Down.

8. Daniells C, de Pomerai D et al. Transgenic nematodes as bio-markers of

9. Mobile Phones and Public Health, Select Committee report, House of Commons (no 489). Either ring 0345 023474 (credit card) or write to: Stationery office, Box 276, Publications Centre, London SW8 STD. In two volumes, approx. f20. Also website: www.parliament.uk/commons/selcom – go to Science and Technology Committee.

10. Report in Electromagnetic Hazard & Therapy I-2:3. 1999.

About the Author

Simon Best MA is the editor of Electromagnetic Hazard & Therapy News Report. Simon Best has a background in psychology and is coauthor, with biophysicist Dr Cyril Smith of Salford University, of Electromagnetic Man: health and hazard in the electrical environment (Dent, 1989), which won the Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine Book of the Year award in 1990. Although currently out of print in English (available in libraries and via the authors) it is published in French and Italian. Since the book, he has edited and published for 10 years the quarterly news report Electromagnetic Hazard & Therapy which covers all aspects of electromagnetic pollution as well as the positive uses of electromagnetism in various therapies.

God bless,

Dr. George J Georgiou, Ph.D.

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products and/or advice are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

The above article is taken from the magazine “Positive Health” – www.positivehealth.com

THE CANCER CURE DESTROYED FOREVER!

During the Christmas festivities I was doing a little clearing of my 5,000 book library at home and came across some of Dr. Raymond Rife’s literature. I sat down and read some of it with the same fascination that I had when I first read it some years ago. This man was one of the most incredible geniuses of our time, who back in the 1930’s, had cured 16 terminally-ill cancer patients with his electronic resonance device. This was an incredible feat, not only then, but also by today’s standards. He had invented a microscope with nearly 6,000 parts that could magnify up to 17,000 without killing the specimen – this is how he identified the cancer virus. Sounds interesting? Let’s start from the beginning!

THE GENIUS OF RIFE!
Royal R. Rife, born in 1888, was one of the greatest scientific geniuses of the 20th century. In 1920 he began searching for an electronic way of killing the TB virus. This is when he built his first electronic instrument that utilized the law of resonance. This instrument could produce profound physiological changes in living organisms, and cure chronic and infectious diseases.

THE PHENOMENON OF RESONANCE!
Dr. Rife discovered that when a cell was exposed to some form of energy to which it is resonant, this energy would be absorbed by the resonant structure. Should the resonant energy be greater than the cell can effectively dissipate, Dr. Rife found that this cell would fail structurally, sometimes resulting in cell death. A simple way to understand resonance is to think of an opera singer who can break a wine glass with her voice – the wine glass resonates at a certain frequency. If the opera singer can match that natural frequency with her voice, then the glass will absorb this resonant energy and smash.

This simple principle can be applied to living organisms too, such as bacteria and viruses. This is what Dr. Rife managed to do – he discovered a resonant frequency that he called the mortal oscillatory rate (MOR) for over 55 major bacterial diseases. He also found the MOR for cancer after arduous years of experimentation using sophisticated microscopes that enabled him to see micro-organisms live, without killing them by staining. Using this equipment he isolated the cancer virus that he called the “BX” virus.

In time, Rife was able to prove that the cancer micro-organism has 4 forms:

1. BX (carcinoma)
2. BY (sarcoma – larger than the BX virus)
3. Monococcoid form in the monocytes of the blood of over 90% of cancer patients.
4. Crytomyces pleomorpha fungi

MONOMORPHISM vs PLEOMORPHISM!
Rife wrote in his 1953 book: “Any of these forms can be changed back to the ‘BX’ within a period of 36 hours and will produce in the experimental animal a typical tumour with all the pathology of true neoplastic tissue, from which we can again recover the ‘BX’ micro-organism. This complete procedure has been duplicated over 300 times with identical and positive results’. There is no doubt that Rife was a perfectionist to the greatest degree!

What did Rife mean when he said that the other forms could be changed back to the ‘BX’ form? If we take what Pasteur has taught the world as the absolute truth, then no micro-organisms can change back to other types. Pasteur taught bacteriology based on the Monomorphism – there is basically one micro-organism that causes each of the different diseases. So, for every disease, there is a different bug. However, this is not what Dr. Rife and other researchers such as Beuchamp, Gaessens and Prof. Enderlein saw in their microscopes. Using a darkfield condenser with an iris objective, they could see different forms changing in front of their own eyes. This went directly against Pasteur’s theory of Monomorphism, to one of Pleomorphism. It is no coincidence that all these researchers, and others, had all seen the same phenomenon of pleomorphism using their microscopes. It is also interesting that monomorphism – one bug for each disease – is still the paradigm that is taught in all medical schools around the world.

By using Live Blood Analysis, it is possible to show that the more toxic the internal mileau of the body, the more these micro-organisms change forms to more and more virulent and pathological types which causes degenerative diseases. The ultimate stage would be the ‘BX’ virus that Rife has not only isolated, or some of the fungal micro-organisms that Prof. Enderlein and others have isolated and are found in over 90% of cancer patients. As Rife declared in 1953: “These successful tests were conducted over 400 times with experimental animals before any attempt was made to use this frequency on human cases of carcinoma and sarcoma.”

CURING CANCER WITH 100% SUCCESS IN 1934!
In 1934, Dr. Rife opened a clinic, which successfully cured 16 of 16 cases within 120 days. Working with some of the most respected researchers in America along with leading doctors from Southern California, he electronically destroyed the cancer virus in patients, allowing their own immune systems to restore health. A Special Research Committee of the University of Southern California oversaw the laboratory research and the experimental treatments until the end of the 1930s. Follow-up clinics conducted in 1935, 1936 and 1937 by the head of the U.S.C. Medical Committee verified the results of the 1934 clinic. In his 1953 book, Dr. Rife wrote about the cancer clinics:

“The first clinical work on cancer was completed under the supervision of Milbank Johnson, M.D. which was set up under a Special Medical Research Committee of the University of Southern California. 16 cases were treated at the clinic for many types of malignancy. After 3 months, 14 of these so-called hopeless cases were signed off as clinically cured by the staff of five medical doctors and Dr. Alvin G. Ford, M.D. Pathologist for the group. The treatments consisted of 3 minutes duration using the frequency instrument, which was set on the mortal oscillatory rate for `BX’ or cancer (at 3 day intervals). It was found that the elapsed time between treatments attains better results than the cases treated daily. This gives the lymphatic system an opportunity to absorb and cast off the toxic condition that is produced by the devitalized dead particles of the `BX’ virus. No rise of body temperature was perceptible in any of these cases above normal during or after the frequency instrument treatment. No special diets were used in any of this clinical work, but we sincerely believe that a proper diet compiled for the individual would be of benefit.” Date: December 1, 1953 Written by R. R. Rife,

Other members of the clinic were Whalen Morrison, Chief Surgeon of the Santa Fe Railway, George C. Dock, M.D., internationally famous, George C. Fischer, M.D., Children’s Hospital in New York, Arthur I. Kendall, Dr. Zite, M.D., professor of pathology at Chicago University, Rufus B. Von Klein Schmidt, President of the University of Southern California.

Dr. Couche and Dr. Carl Meyer, Ph.D., head of the Department of Bacteriological Research at the Hooper Foundation in San Francisco were also present. Dr. Kopps of the Metabolic Clinic in La Jolla signed all 14 reports and knew of all the tests from his personal observation.

One year later on September 18, 1935, Milbank Johnson wrote to Dr. Thomas Burger and Dr. C. Ray Launsberry in San Diego:

“This will introduce to you Mr. Thomas Knight. He was the man who had the carcinoma over the malar bone of his left cheek that we treated at the clinic in La Jolla last year.”

TESTIMONIALS OF CANCER CURES!
In 1956, Dr. James Gouche made the following declaration:

“I would like to make this historical record of the amazing scientific wonders regarding the efficacy of the frequencies of the Royal R. Rife Frequency Instrument.”

“In that period of time I saw many things and the one that impressed me the most was a man who staggered onto a table, just on the last end of cancer; he was a bag of bones. As he lay on the table, Dr. Rife and Dr. Johnson said, `Just feel that man’s stomach.’ So I put my hand on the cavity where his stomach was underneath and it was just a cavity almost, because he was so thin; his backbone and his belly were just about touching each other.
“I put my hand on his stomach which was just one solid mass, just about what I could cover with my hand, somewhat like the shape of a heart. It was absolutely solid! And I thought to myself, well, nothing can be done for that. However, they gave him a treatment with the Rife frequencies and in the course of time over a period of six weeks to two months, to my astonishment, he completely recovered. He got so well that he asked permission to go to El Centro as he had a farm there and he wanted to see about his stock. Dr. Rife said, `Now you haven’t the strength to drive to El Centro.’ “Oh, yes” said he. “I have, but I’ll have a man to drive me there.” As a matter of fact, the patient drove his own car there and when he got down to El Centro he had a sick cow and he stayed up all night with it. The next day he drove back without any rest whatsoever so you can imagine how he had recovered.”

“I saw other cases that were very interesting. Then I wanted a copy of the frequency instrument. I finally bought one of these frequency instruments and established it in my office.”

“I saw some very remarkable things resulting from it in the course of over twenty years.
I had a Mexican boy, nine years of age, who had osteomyelitis of the leg. His attending doctors treated him at the Mercy Hospital. They scraped the bone every week. It was agonizing to the child because they never gave him anything; they just poked in there and cleaned him out and the terror of that boy was awful. He wore a splint and was on crutches. His family brought him to the office. He was terrified that I would poke him as the other doctors had done. I reassured him and demonstrated the instrument on my own hand to show him that it would not hurt. With the bandage and splint still on he was given a treatment. In less than two weeks of treatment the wound was completely healed and he took off his splints and threw them away. He is a great big powerful man now and has never had any comeback of his osteomyelitis. He was completely cured. There were many cases such as this.”

Independent physicians utilizing the equipment successfully treated as many as 40 people per day during these years. In addition to curing cancer and other deadly diseases, degenerative conditions such as cataracts were reversed. Rife had been able to determine the precise electrical frequency that destroyed individual micro-organisms responsible for cancer, herpes, tuberculosis, and other illnesses. His work was described in Science magazine, medical journals, and later the Smithsonian Institution’s annual report.

THE BIG BOYS MOVE IN – CANCER CURE SUPPRESSED!
Unfortunately, Rife’s scientific theories and method of treatment conflicted with orthodox views. His work was stopped and both the research and the treatments were forced underground. The AMA took him and his associates to court – this trial would start Rife on a long road of deterioration, alcoholism and depression ……… as the deaths from cancer mounted year after year. While the court case was taking place (and afterwards), the AMA visited all the doctors involved. Those who didn’t stop using the Frequency Instrument would lose their medical license. One of his main co-supporters Milbank Johnson died under mysterious circumstances (possibly poisoned), and records of Rife’s work were destroyed. No medical journal was ever permitted to print Rife’s work, except one by the Franklin Institute that slipped by the censors. In 1946, Rife’s problems forced him to sell off his laboratory piece by piece.

Doctors secretly continued curing cancer patients for 22 years after the original success of the 1934 clinic, but always with opposition from medical and governmental authorities. However, from 1950 to the mid-1980s, a number of research scientists, working independently, have slowly been verifying the scientific principles upon which Rife’s clinical cures of the 1930s were based. A body of recognized scientific evidence now overwhelmingly supports the original cancer theories articulated and demonstrated by Rife 50 years ago. This includes modern AIDS researchers.

In the 1950s, John Crane – engineer, machinist, laboratory analyst, health researcher and inventor – became Rife’s partner. Crane, born in 1915, worked at Rife’s side from 1950 until Rife’s death in 1971. During this time, he learned all the secrets of Rife’s cancer cure . . . and all the details of its suppression. Together, the two men designed and constructed new and better equipment, and managed to interest a new generation of doctors in the possibilities of a genuine, lasting and painless cancer cure. And again the authorities struck. Crane was jailed, equipment was smashed, and records were destroyed. Again the motives driving on the forces of suppression were the same.

As Barry Lynes explains in his excellent book “The Cancer Cure That Worked: Fifty Years of Suppression:” “The AMA was guarding its pocket book, the pharmaceutical companies had “chemotherapy” to push for profit, because the American Cancer Society was a big money public relations fraud, because the FDA was owned by the cancer monopolies, because the media was silent, silent, silent.”

Such is the state of modern “political” medicine. The authorities protect their prestige and huge research grants while almost half-million Americans die of cancer every year. Political leaders legislate more money for research. But the money goes directly into the hands of those who refuse to consider that a pleomorphic bacteria/virus is the cause of cancer, and very possibly AIDS. New chemotherapy is devised for new, desperate, human guinea pigs. Talking about “barking up the wrong tree,” and what a shameful waste of public funds! Imagine what could have been achieved by Rife and his followers had this money been funnelled into his work, instead of the pharmaceutical industries? Do you think that cancer would be claiming about ONE LIFE PER MINUTE in the US alone?

Many people have tried to replicate the original Rife device, with little success.

THE RIFE-BARE DEVICE!
In September of 1995, an American Chiropractor by the name of James E. Bare, from Albuquerque, New Mexico, an electronics tinkerer since his early teens, set to work on a prototype Rife instrument after reading Barry Lynne’s book in late 1994. By late 1995 his Rife/Bare device started producing astounding health effects.

Users of this device have reported vasodilation of the blood vessels in the skin, and, as a result, some dramatic benefits: age-spots disappearing, skin thickening and becoming more youthful in appearance, slight hair-regrowth on the scalp, as well as memory improvement and alertness in the aged. Certain frequencies have been used to stop seizures as they occur. Users also report very dramatic pain-alleviating and muscle-relaxing effects at selected frequencies.

But most importantly, there have been reports that the device can resonate and destroy cancer cells (and sarcoma) in the body. It does this so well that one of the major problems is gauging the exposures that people can tolerate. There is also physiological stimulation of the immune system. At certain frequencies, the device stimulates white blood cells into a state of hyperactivity that can be observed microscopically.

I have personally purchased such a Rife/Bare device, which costs between $2,5000 and $3,000. My personal experiences are interesting – when I run the device for a couple of hours or so, irrelevant of the frequencies used – it gives me a lot of energy. In fact, one day when I inadvertently forgot the machine on all day, I had trouble sleeping that night. Besides the highly increased energy levels, I had a clarity of mind that was remarkable – I sat for hours absorbing material from books like a sponge. I eventually had to put myself to sleep as I had work the following day. It can “pop” my sinuses in less than 10 minutes when placed on the correct frequencies, and can alleviate headaches in about the same time. I am certain that it is capable of much more, but what is really needed is an input of money to set up an organized research laboratory with scientists that can again open the chapter of Rife research using modern-day equipment. If there are any such people around, please let me know!

For those interested in buying Barry Lynes book: “The Cancer Cure That Worked: Fifty Years of Suppression” please click here and order directly from Amazon.com

If you are interested in reading more about Rife and the Rife/Bare device, the following sites will prove helpful:

http://www.rt66.com/~rifetech – This site, developed by Dr. James Bare provides the latest and most comprehensive information available about Rife/Bare technology.

http://www.rt66.com/~rifetech/links.html – Tons of links to lots of articles about Rife and his technology.

http://www.rifetechnology.com – lots of info about the practical uses of the Rife/Bare device.

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/1251 – Thomas Rice offers a site with letters from all over the world on the results people are getting from the use of the device.

http://www.navi-net/~rsc – The Robert Cathey site has an absolute wealth of material related to Royal Rife, and offer a variety of material related to topics of historical interest.

http://www.keeleynet.com/rife/bhrd.htm – Theory paper on Rife’s original instrument.

http://www.rife.org – Stan Truman’s site offers a variety of letters and documents written by Rife, along with newspaper and scientific journal reports on Rife and his developments. At this site, you can read scanned copies of newspaper and journal articles written about and by Dr. Rife in the 1930’s and 40’s.

God bless!

Dr. George J. Georgiou, Ph.D.
Clinical Nutritionist – Master Herbalist – Naturopath – Homeopath – Iridologist – Clinical Sexologist – Clinical Psychologist
webmaster@worldwidehealthcenter.net

This week I would like to share with you something that I read about, and have consequently tested on myself as well as a number of patients who volunteered. It is how to kill the HIV virus, as well as many other viruses while they are in the blood using a simple “Black Box” device that produces a minute current using batteries. Interested? Read on, it is truly fascinating!

ELECTRICITY KILLS VIRUSES!
In a remarkable discovery at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, N.Y.C. in 1990, it was shown that a minute current (50 to 100 MICRO amperes) can alter outer protein layers of HIV virus in a petri dish so as to prevent its subsequent attachment to receptor sites. (SCIENCE NEWS, March 30, 1991 page 207.) It may also reverse Epstein Barr (chronic fatigue syndrome), hepatitis, and herpes B. HIV positive users of this enclosed information may expect a NEGATIVE p24 surface antigen or PCR test (no more HIV detectable in blood) after 30 days. This is reminiscent of a well-proven cure for snakebite by application of electric current that instantly neutralizes the venom’s toxicity. (LANCET, July 26, 1986, page 229.) And there may be several other as yet undiscovered or untested viruses neutralizable with this discovery.

This very simple blood clearing treatment offered great promise as a positive method for immobilizing known strains of HIV still present and contaminating some European and US blood bank reserve supplies. It was further suggested that infected human HIV carriers could be cured by removing their blood, treating it electrically and returning it by methods similar to dialysis. Dr.
Steven Kaali, MD, projected that “years of testing will be in order before such an IN VITRO (blood removed for treatment) device can be made ready for widespread use” (LONGEVITY, Dec. 1992, page 14.).

DR. ROBERT BECK
The pioneer scientist and inventor of this remarkable device is Dr. Robert C. Beck, D.Sc. (See http://www.ioa.com/~dragonfly/morebeck.html for more info). In Dr. Beck’s opinion both blood and lymph can be cleared IN VIVO (which means blood isn’t removed) simply, rapidly, and inexpensively with similar but NON-INVASIVE techniques. Electronic and controlled electroporation approaches may well make vaccines (even if possible someday), pharmaceuticals, supplements, oxygen and diet therapies, plus other proposed remedies obsolete, even if they worked and were free.

In a public lecture (Oct. 19, 1991) the writer’s opinion proposed this theoretical do-it-yourself method for accomplishing HIV “neutralization” IN VIVO. Subsequently, his original modalities
and protocols have been extensively peer reviewed, refined, simplified and made universally affordable (under $75 for BOTH devices including batteries when self-made). These two simple treatments used in tandem can potentially nullify well over 95% (and perhaps 100%) of known HIV strains residing in BOTH blood, lymph, and other body tissue and fluids.

Following is a summary of two years of offshore feedback with this non-iatrogenic, do-it yourself, simple and inexpensive experimental solution to the ever escalating AIDS dilemma. There are no known side effects since milliampere currents are much lower than those in FDA approved TENS, CES and muscle stimulators which have been in daily use for many years. Battery replacement costs are under 25c per month per user or about 1c per day for a typical 21 day “spontaneous remission”.

No doctors, pharmaceuticals, ozone, or other intervention appears necessary. The pocket-sized, battery-powered, BLOOD clearing instrument is basically a miniature relay driven by a timer chip set to ~0.67 Hertz. Its 0 to 36V user adjustable biphasic output minimizes electrode site irritation. The described system delivers stimulation through NORMALLY CIRCULATING BLOOD via electrodes placed at selected sites (such as one electrode behind ankle bone on inside of foot and another identically located on opposite foot) over the sural, popliteal, posterior tibial, or peronal arteries where the subjects’ veins and arteries are accessibly close to the surface.

Using neutralization approximately 8 to 20 minutes per day for about three or four weeks should, according to Dr. Beck, effectively immobilize well over 95% of any HIV and simultaneously any other electrosensitive viruses in blood. In heavy infections, shorter application times could prevent overloading patient with toxins. Simply treat for a greater number of days.

In time, the restored immune system will handle residual problems. In the special case of impaired circulation due to diabetes, longer treatment times may be indicated. Immobilized viruses may be expelled naturally through kidneys and liver. More rapid neutralization is easily possible but not recommended because of potential excessive toxic elimination reactions. (Herxheimer’s syndrome). T-cell counts may drop initially (because of lysing and subsequent scavenging by macrophages) but should recover to over 200 within 90 days.

If you want to learn more about this fascinating topic, go to: http://www.rarebooks.net/beck

God bless!

Dr. George J. Georgiou, Ph.D.
Clinical Nutritionist – Master Herbalist – Naturopath – Homeopath – Iridologist – Clinical Sexologist – Clinical Psychologist
webmaster@worldwidehealthcenter.net

The Food and Drug Administration have not evaluated these statements. This information and products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.